Trump’s tariff plans take shape.

https://i.abcnewsfe.com/a/df7cf68e-b745-412f-a609-44bcf8cb5dcc/trump-ap-jt-240925_1727295299115_hpMain_16x9.jpg?w=608

At the end of January 2025, the U.S. government revealed its intentions to impose tariffs on imported pharmaceuticals, steel, and computer chips. This action seeks to strengthen local manufacturing and tackle trade imbalances. Yet, these steps might profoundly impact global trade relations, especially influencing major U.S. partners in Asia.

In late January 2025, the U.S. administration announced plans to implement tariffs on imported computer chips, pharmaceuticals, and steel. This initiative aims to bolster domestic manufacturing and address trade imbalances. However, such measures could have significant implications for international trade dynamics, particularly affecting key U.S. allies in Asia.

The semiconductor industry is set to be considerably impacted by the suggested tariffs. Asia leads the world in chip manufacturing, contributing to over 80% of global semiconductor production. Prominent corporations like Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. (TSMC) and South Korea’s Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix serve as primary suppliers to the U.S. marketplace. For example, TSMC, known as the largest contract chip producer globally, earns close to 70% of its income from North American clients, including major tech firms such as Nvidia and Apple. Though TSMC is working on a $65 billion production facility in Arizona, the bulk of its output is still based in Taiwan, rendering it vulnerable to the planned tariffs. Likewise, Samsung and SK Hynix, which together hold about 75% of the global DRAM market, may encounter difficulties due to their significant exports to the U.S.

The semiconductor sector is poised to be significantly affected by these proposed tariffs. Asia dominates global chip production, accounting for over 80% of the world’s semiconductors. Leading companies such as Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. (TSMC) and South Korea’s Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix are major suppliers to the U.S. market. For instance, TSMC, the world’s largest contract chipmaker, derives approximately 70% of its revenue from North American clients, including tech giants like Nvidia and Apple. While TSMC is investing in a $65 billion manufacturing facility in Arizona, the majority of its production remains in Taiwan, making it susceptible to the proposed tariffs. Similarly, Samsung and SK Hynix, which together control around 75% of the global DRAM market, could face challenges due to their substantial exports to the U.S.

The pharmaceutical industry is also a key target of the proposed tariffs. Japanese pharmaceutical enterprises, such as Takeda, Astellas, Daiichi Sankyo, and Eisai, hold considerable interests in the U.S. market. For instance, Takeda noted that more than half of its revenue in the previous fiscal year was generated from the U.S., whereas Astellas mentioned that 41% of its earnings were derived from the U.S. market. Tariffs on imported pharmaceuticals might disrupt their operations and financial outcomes, potentially resulting in higher costs for U.S. consumers.

Steel Sector and Wider Economic Effects

Steel Industry and Broader Economic Implications

International Trade Ties and Possible Retaliation

The suggested tariffs have raised worries among U.S. allies in Asia. Nations such as Taiwan, South Korea, and Japan, crucial to the worldwide supply chains of semiconductors and pharmaceuticals, could face economic difficulties due to diminished competitiveness in the American market. These countries might look to negotiate exemptions or contemplate retaliatory tariffs on U.S. exports, possibly initiating a cycle of trade conflicts.

Consideraciones Económicas Nacionales

Domestic Economic Considerations

While the tariffs aim to promote domestic manufacturing, they could have mixed effects on the U.S. economy. Importers are likely to pass increased costs onto consumers, leading to higher prices for goods such as electronics and medications. Additionally, industries dependent on imported components may face challenges in sourcing materials, potentially hindering production and innovation. Economists caution that such protectionist measures could disrupt supply chains and may not yield the intended benefits of job creation in the targeted industries.

By Marrion Shuerler

You May Also Like